Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • New this year: ChatGPT for every student
    An illustration picture shows ChatGPT artificial intelligence software, which generates humanlike conversation, in February 2023 in Lierde, Belgium. Experts say AI can be incredibly useful for lawyers — they just have to verify their work.
    CSU has invested far more aggressively in generative AI tools than other public universities, both in dollars spent and in the number of students served.

    Topline:

    The Cal State University system will spend nearly $17 million to make ChatGPT available to all students and faculty. A CSU spokesperson told LAist that, due to the system’s size, it secured a deal and paid “the lowest price possible” for the product.

    Why it matters: CSU has invested far more aggressively in generative AI tools than other public universities, both in dollars spent and in the number of students served.

    The university's financial positions: CSU is the nation’s largest public four-year system, with more than 460,000 students. Currently, the system is facing a $2.3 billion budget gap, despite a tuition increase and spending cuts that meant fewer course offerings for students.

    Keep reading… for faculty reaction and an assessment of how the CSU contract with ChatGPT compares to other public universities.

    California State University is the nation’s largest public four-year system, with nearly half a million students. So it’s a big deal that starting this year, CSU will make OpenAI’s ChatGPT available to all those students and its faculty.

    It’s also controversial.

    The effort will cost the CSU nearly $17 million — even as the system faces a $2.3 billion budget gap. That gap persists despite a tuition increase and spending cuts that have meant fewer course offerings for students.

    University officials say providing access to quality AI tools is an issue of equity. Across the system’s 23 campuses, some students were paying for their own ChatGPT subscriptions. CSU spokesperson Amy Bentley-Smith said the goal is for all students to have “the same access to the tools and learning opportunities that will prepare them for the future,” regardless of which campus they attend.

    The creep of AI is undeniable. On college campuses, it has transformed how students and professors approach tests and assignments. Students have filed lawsuits for being accused of using AI and sued college professors for using the tools many of them use regularly. AI has also diminished the earning potential of recently lucrative majors, leaving colleges in the position of trying to keep up.

    Those efforts point to why, in recent years, OpenAI has established business deals with universities across the country, including multiple public institutions.

    At what cost? For the most part, the company and colleges involved have not made the price of these services publicly available.

    Public records obtained by LAist for universities across the country show CSU’s massive scale appears to have helped it land a deal on ChatGPT subscriptions, and that CSU has invested far more aggressively in generative AI tools than other public universities, both in dollars spent and in the number of students served.

    In an email earlier this year, CSU’s Bentley-Smith said the system leveraged economies of scale “to ensure that the CSU paid the lowest price possible.”

    What is ChatGPT Edu? And how are students and faculty using it?

    OpenAI is a leading generative artificial intelligence company valued at hundreds of billions of dollars, despite currently operating at a loss. On its website, the company touts business deals with at least a dozen public and private colleges worldwide, ranging from Arizona State University to Oxford.

    A large sign made of individual letters that spell out "CSUDH" in maroon and yellow. Below is a sign that reads "California State University, Dominguez Hills."
    University officials say they want students at each Cal State campus to have access to the same learning tools.
    (
    Julie Leopo
    /
    LAist
    )

    OpenAI provides these schools with a product called ChatGPT Edu, a chatbot specifically designed for college settings.

    ChatGPT Edu is tailored to each campus. And with it, universities provide access to a mix of OpenAI products. This can include the company’s flagship model, ChatGPT‑5, along with other tools. ChatGPT Edu also enables students and faculty to make custom AI models. At Columbia University in New York City, for instance, faculty researchers built a prediction tool to help reduce overdose fatalities. The model analyzes and synthesizes large datasets to inform interventions and, according to OpenAI, it enables the team to reduce “weeks of research work into seconds.”

    ChatGPT Edu can also help with more run-of-the-mill work. Some of the tasks the company suggests include: personalized tutoring for students, helping researchers write grant applications and assisting faculty with grading.

    A version of ChatGPT is available at no cost, but ChatGPT Edu allows for higher message limits than the free version. OpenAI also says student and faculty data are kept private and aren’t used to train its models.

    (LAist requested an interview with Leah Belsky, OpenAI’s vice president of education, but a spokesperson said she was not available by the time of publication.)

    Earlier this year, CSU launched a new AI initiative — a public-private partnership between the university system; the California governor’s office; and 10 tech giants, including Microsoft, NVIDIA and OpenAI.

    We still have a half a million students, even though we're being challenged with funding in general. And we still want to prepare them for the future.
    — Leslie Kennedy, assistant vice chancellor, CSU

    The university system also put out a call for proposals, asking faculty to come up with strategies “that prepare students to thrive in a rapidly evolving digital world while promoting critical thinking, ethical AI use and integrating AI literacy into curricula.” In May, the CSU announced that it received more than 400 proposals from over 750 faculty members. Ultimately, 63 of those proposals were awarded $30,000 to $60,000 grants.

    Leslie Kennedy, assistant vice chancellor of academic technology services, told LAist the $3 million in grants came from the division of academic and student affairs, which provides funding for special projects.

    How CSU’s OpenAI contract compares to other public U.S. universities

    The basic, free version of ChatGPT provides limited access to the chatbot’s core functions. For access to more advanced features, the average user can subscribe to ChatGPT Plus for $20 a month. (The highest level of access costs $200 a month.)

    Public records show that, during the first six months of this year, CSU paid roughly $1.9 million dollars to make ChatGPT Edu available to 40,000 users. From July 2025 to June 2026, the university system will pay another $15 million to make the product available to 500,000 users. This, said spokesperson Bentley-Smith in an email, “represents a significant savings.”

    It’s also clear CSU secured a far lower cost–per-student than other universities, in contracts reviewed by LAist:

    Money flows the other direction, too. Redacted documents obtained from Texas A&M indicate that, in February 2025, OpenAI made a one-time gift of $50,000 to the Texas A&M Foundation, a nonprofit that operates independently from the university and manages private donations. The gift was earmarked for the development of generative AI literacy at the Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station.

    LAist asked other universities with OpenAI deals if they have plans to make ChatGPT available to everyone on campus; ASU, for example, enrolls nearly 200,000 students. At UMass Lowell, with more than 17,000 students, spokesperson David Joyner told LAist via email that “the university is evaluating generative AI options we may be able to offer broadly. However, we do not have current plans to license community-wide ChatGPT access." Other universities had not responded as of publication.

    LAist is still waiting on public records for other public universities in the U.S. We will update this story as we obtain that information.

    Friction between CSU leaders and educators

    Despite CSU’s sizable discount, some educators have criticized the system’s gambit.

    “For me, it's frightening,” said Kevin Wehr, a sociology professor at Sacramento State and chair of the California Faculty Association’s bargaining team. “I already have all sorts of problems with students engaging in plagiarism. This feels like it takes a shot of steroids and injects it in the arm of that particular beast.”

    But Wehr said AI buy-in among faculty runs the gamut.

    “I know faculty who are embracing [AI] with open arms. [They’re] building it into their curriculum, building it into their assignments, teaching students how to use these tools and how not to use these tools and what to be aware of and what the pitfalls and problems are,” he said. “And I want them to feel completely supported in their work.”

    AI Microcredential for CSU Students

    The CSU is offering free AI training for everyone in the system; the modules explain what AI is and how to use it. They also cover ethical and responsible use. According to assistant vice chancellor Kennedy, the modules were developed by San Diego State, Fresno State and Cal State Monterey Bay. Once students complete the exercises, they will earn a microcredential, which could give them an edge when they’re on the job hunt, she added.

    Students can enroll for this training here.

    Wehr told LAist that faculty members' foremost concern is the technology's capacity to reshape the workforce. Faculty are also worried about harm to the environment, given the massive power needs to run AI, which include the increased use of fresh water to cool data centers.

    Wehr also noted that chatbots sometimes generate inaccurate information, known as “hallucinations.” He also expressed concern over language learning models with built-in racial and gender biases.

    Above all, Wehr expressed distaste for the expense at a time when the CSU is struggling financially. In his view, it speaks to misplaced priorities.

    “We are cutting programs. We are merging campuses. We are laying off faculty. We are making it harder for students to graduate,” Wehr said. And instead of using that money to ameliorate those issues, he added, “we're giving it to the richest technology companies in the world."

    Bentley-Smith, the CSU spokesperson, said the money for ChatGPT Edu “came from one-time funds from the Chancellor's Office, not from university budgets.”

    The university’s vision for the future

    LAist brought the faculty’s concerns to assistant vice chancellor Kennedy and the CSU’s chief information officer Ed Clark, who oversees IT strategy across CSU. Clark said the move was necessary from a system perspective.

    “We were seeing certain universities that had more resources saying: ‘We're going to go sign a deal with X vendor or Y vendor,’” he said. “That was already happening in the CSU. For us at the system office, that's not OK, because then … you're a faculty member or a student at the wrong campus, you don't have access. So we wanted to make sure everybody had access.”

    Clark added that the deal is important for individuals, too.

    “Many people had already signed up for individual licenses for ChatGPT, whether they were faculty, staff, or students, but only the people that could afford that were doing that,” he said. “That was also leaving our community behind. So, we wanted to think about it system-wide in terms of access, equity, outcomes for all, and that is why we went system-wide.”

    His words for critics? “Join us,” he said. “ Help us shape the future.”

    Kennedy also responded to complaints from faculty who aren’t pleased with the pivot to AI.

    “We still have a half a million students, even though we're being challenged with funding in general. And we still want to prepare them for the future,” she said. “That's why we moved ahead.”

    The systemwide initiative was developed with recommendations from a CSU Generative AI committee. Members included CSU faculty senate appointees, a Cal State Student Association appointee and representatives from other CSU stakeholder groups. Three of about two dozen members were part of the faculty.

    What happens when the deal expires?

    Clark said the system has hired a firm to assess CSU’s return on its OpenAI investment. The success of the deal will be determined by taking a host of factors into account, including how ChatGPT is used in the classroom; student learning outcomes; administrative productivity; and environmental impact.

    CSU’s contract with OpenAI is for 18 months total. It’s unclear how expensive a renewal would be, or how the system might use its leverage to negotiate with other companies.

    “We knew things could change so rapidly that maybe something else would emerge and we said ‘maybe this is better now,” Clark said. “We did want to have that flexibility, but we are also very very happy with our partnership with OpenAI and the ChatGPT rollout at this moment.”

  • Inside California's last nuclear power plant
    two large cylindrical stone buildings rise up against a blue sky, surrounded by a number of smaller, mostly gray buildings.
    The Diablo Canyon Power Plant in San Luis Obispo on Feb. 13, the state’s only active nuclear power plant. All eyes are turned to power plant as the debate about extending its life returns to Sacramento. But what’s it like inside?

    Topline:

    Diablo Canyon is California’s last operating nuclear power plant. Just years ago, the plant was slated to close, and employees worked to decommission it, until a 2022 about-face by Gov. Gavin Newsom led the state to extend its operations to 2030. Now lawmakers in Sacramento are talking about allowing it to operate even longer, potentially to 2045.

    What do those who oppose the plant say? Local groups, some of whom have protested the plant since its construction, are banging the drum ever louder about their concerns for safety or a catastrophic meltdown, as well as the danger posed by spent nuclear waste at a site near several seismic fault lines.

    What about academics? Academics are furiously analyzing how much keeping Diablo Canyon open would cost and if it would support or hinder the state’s clean energy transition. And business groups are lining up in support.

    Read on ... for a rare look inside the last operating nuclear power plant in the state.

    The most striking view off one of San Luis Obispo County’s winding coastal roads is not the lashing ocean waves of the Pacific Ocean or cows plodding out from the shade of a California live oak tree.

    It is two enormous concrete domes that come into focus along a final climb that began 7 miles back at Avila Beach. The land sinks away, and what looks like a small town emerges, showcased in a palette of grays, whites and terracotta.

    This is Diablo Canyon, California’s last operating nuclear power plant.

    Just years ago, the plant was slated to close, and employees worked to decommission it, until a 2022 about-face by Gov. Gavin Newsom led the state to extend its operations to 2030. Now lawmakers in Sacramento are talking about allowing it to operate even longer, potentially to 2045.

    But local groups, some of whom have protested the plant since its construction, are banging the drum ever louder about their concerns for safety or a catastrophic meltdown, as well as the danger posed by spent nuclear waste at a site near several seismic fault lines.

    Meanwhile, academics are furiously analyzing how much keeping Diablo Canyon open would cost and if it would support or hinder the state’s clean energy transition. And business groups are lining up in support.

    So when PG&E offered press tours earlier this year, KQED accepted. The nuclear power plant has not garnered this much attention in years, but now, once again, all eyes are on Diablo Canyon. What does it look like inside?

    Out on the water

    PG&E’s Diablo Canyon Power Plant tour started on a boat in a protected marina just south of the reactors. This, and another cove just outside the breakwaters, are the site of a key piece of the plant’s cooling system — and a major concern for environmentalists, who argue it hoovers up and kills marine life and have called it “the most destructive facility” along California’s coast.

    Dipping a hand in Diablo Cove, the water is lukewarm, not the frosty standard for the ocean in these parts.

    That’s because Diablo Canyon draws 2 billion3-2.5 billion gallons of ocean water daily — enough to fill more than 3,000 Olympic-size swimming pools — into the plant to cool equipment, and discharges the water back into the ocean typically 16 to 17 degrees hotter.

    The warmer water makes it feel as if a chunk of Southern California’s coast has been lobbed off and transferred north.

    Out on the water, there was a hotbed of animal activity: a floating sea otter and chubby seals sunning themselves on rocks.

    There were other species too — sea bass, stingrays, and California’s state fish, the garibaldi, which typically live farther south along California’s coast, but have moved here.

    Diablo Canyon staff said the warm water leads to essentially no change to the environment. Because fishing and other activities are not allowed within 2,000 yards of the plant, it’s a “de facto marine sanctuary,” said Tom Jones, a senior director in charge of future planning for Diablo Canyon.

    But the California Coastal Commission, the state agency tasked with protecting the coastline and its natural resources, reported in 2025 that the plant’s cooling system kills almost two billion larval fish annually, plus other organisms that aren’t measured.

    While adult populations may be abundant in Diablo Cove, the commission wrote that adults often appear far from where they spawn, and their presence here may be the result of productive marine habitats nearby.

    The commission also warned that removing eggs and larvae near Diablo Canyon leads to “a significant reduction” of species dozens of miles from the plant.

    “These planktonic organisms,” wrote the commission, “constitute the base of the food web in California’s coastal waters.”

    To the turbine deck

    We donned hard hats and safety equipment and passed through heavy security to enter the “protected area,” which consists of spaces closer to the nuclear reactors.

    We entered the turbine deck, an industrial building the size of two-and-a-half football fields. It was hot and loud on the deck, with a slight vibration underfoot.

    The steam-driven turbine inside is an enormous semi-cylinder that looks like a horizontal steel pipe cut in half, and spins a generator to produce electricity.

    The PG&E guide pointed out the window at a containment dome, where uranium atoms are split apart, releasing huge amounts of heat.

    A cascade of effects follows: the heat warms water and creates steam, the steam travels through pipes to turn the turbine, the turbine connects to a generator, which makes electricity that’s then sent across the grid and delivered to about three million Californians.

    Nuclear generates nearly 9% of the state’s energy supply, part of an energy mix that includes gas, hydroelectric, solar, wind, geothermal and even small amounts of coal.

    While California’s demand for electricity has been flat for years, it’s now growing with the adoption of electric vehicles, people swapping gas appliances for electric ones, and data centers.

    The debate to keep Diablo Canyon open is spurred, in part, by this uptick in demand. Maureen Zawalick, senior vice president and chief risk officer at PG&E, said stepping into the turbine deck reminds her of the end uses of all this power: “safety in hospitals, kidney dialysis, stop lights and everything else.”

    California is walking its economy across a tightrope.

    The state’s growth in the 20th century was built on a foundation of fossil fuels, but leaders see its future as being powered by the buildout of renewables like solar and wind, along with batteries to store excess power.

    When heat waves strained California’s power grid and caused rolling blackouts in 2020, state lawmakers and Newsom voted to extend Diablo Canyon’s operation.

    Now, as electricity bills continue to rise and demand is forecast to grow, proponents argue that keeping the plant open even longer can help California wobble across the precarious middle of the tightrope.

    The simulator

    We shed our safety gear and headed to the training building, with classrooms and an exact replica of the control room, called the simulator.

    It was cool and quiet again as employees completed a training exercise, manipulating switches, lights and screens on a semicircle of vertical boards. Zawalick said the simulator’s seafoam green walls are meant to inspire calm, but its very existence is due to nuclear disasters that have occurred elsewhere in the U.S.

    Simulators became a requirement for all nuclear power plants in 1979 after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident in Pennsylvania. The partial meltdown was the most serious nuclear accident in U.S. history and was caused by both human and equipment failure.

    Practicing in a replica of Diablo Canyon’s actual control room is meant to train workers with the muscle memory to handle a variety of emergencies.

    Employees spend 20% of their time in the Diablo Canyon simulator training for everything from planned refueling to routine maintenance to major emergencies.

    Spent nuclear fuel

    To finish the tour, we drove uphill and farther from the ocean to find dozens of hulking concrete cylinders that contain spent fuel, called “dry casks.”

    The nuclear material is the concern of resident groups who fear an earthquake or terrorist attack could destabilize the storage and spew radioactive waste into the ocean or nearby communities. People living nearby are mailed annual emergency preparedness documents and have access to a free dose of potassium iodide, which protects the thyroid gland against radiation.

    Linda Seeley has rallied against Diablo Canyon for decades as a member of the anti-nuclear nonprofit Mothers for Peace.

    “As much as I would love it if nuclear waste were not toxic and lethal to a thousand generations in the future, that’s not the fact. The fact is that it is toxic,” she said.

    Once fuel has been used inside the plant, radiation levels are dangerously high and have the potential to kill an exposed person in minutes.

    The spent fuel spends 7 to 10 years next to the reactors in “wet storage,” a large pool of water treated with chemicals. The liquid absorbs heat and decays of the uranium, which has high levels of radiation.

    The nuclear material is then packed into the double-lined, stainless steel and reinforced dry casks, roughly 20 feet tall. Each is bolted to a 7.5-foot-thick, steel-reinforced concrete pad designed to withstand earthquakes. The fuel requires special handling for tens of thousands of years.

    Diablo Canyon is located roughly 3.5 miles from the Hosgri fault, which presents the main seismic risk to the plant. Another fault, the Shoreline, is closer to the plant, but smaller. Some seismologists are concerned that a quake along the faults could cause a meltdown.

    The U.S. government is legally obligated to take ownership of all commercially spent nuclear fuel, but because the government has not yet built a permanent place to put it, the fuel is stored at the power plant.

    Current solutions like Diablo Canyon’s dry storage casks, while they may be thorough, are only licensed until 2064 by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

    Zawalick said PG&E is confident in the storage of Diablo Canyon’s spent fuel, though. She pointed out that nuclear power is “the only energy source that knows exactly where every ounce of our waste is.” The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PG&E monitor the spent fuel on a daily and annual basis. “It’s secured, it’s inspected, it’s audited, it’s sampled. I’m a fan of all energy sources, but I don’t know where solar panels are sent when they’re done, and batteries, and all of that.”

    Zawalick pointed to the powerful transmission lines carrying energy created here out to millions of Californians: to illuminate rooms for special and mundane occasions, preserve food in refrigerators, run air conditioners, and warm their shower water.

    Order and safety come up frequently on the Diablo Canyon Power Plant tour: background checks, armed guards, seismic protective measures, reminders to hold on to handrails when on steps. The result is a calm and kempt environment, situated on a hillside overlooking the Pacific.

    But underneath the serenity lie the inherent risks of nuclear power, especially when sited near seismic fault lines. Diablo Canyon has been the source of passionate debate as long as the idea of it has existed. And any effort to keep it operating longer will be no different.

    And with that, the tour was over, and the guides returned to their work. A cow made its way slowly across the access road, with no idea of its contentious neighbor.

  • Sponsored message
  • Here's what not to miss in L.A. and SoCal.
    A troll figure, made from discarded wood and other lefetover materials, appears to look at the camera with a pleasant expression.
    Thomas Dambo's "TROLLS: A Field Study" exhibition is at the South Coast Botanic Garden through October.

    In this edition:

    Spaceballs at Griffith Observatory, Netflix is a Joke kicks off, Trolls take over South Coast Botanical Garden, and more of the best things to do this week.

    Highlights:

    • Where to even begin with all the incredible comedy listings for this year’s Netflix Is a Joke festival? Pretty much every venue in L.A. has a comedy show this week.
    • Griffith Observatory is hosting a very special screening of the best spoof of all time ever (don’t @ me), Spaceballs.
    • L.A. has a wealth of architectural and modern building feats, many of which we have more access to than any other city, given our (relative!) youth. UCLA’s School of Architecture has some of this history on display at the "Core Samples" exhibit, including posters from talks by Frank Gehry and John Julius Norwich and archival materials.

    We all need a good story to start the week, and this one is the best. Pasadena Humane has rehomed its last dog rescued from the Eaton Fire. Artemis, a German shepherd, is happily in his forever home, and now we can all sleep a little easier. What a good boy!

    Music this week includes the last of the free spring lunchtime concerts at the Colburn on Tuesday, May 5. Licorice Pizza has more picks, including Meshell Ndegeocello at Blue Note on Monday and Tuesday. Wednesday, Sports are at the Roxy, Saults are at the Teragram, Waxahatchee and MJ Lenderman play Disney Hall, and over at the Grammy Museum, there’s a screening of the Ann Wilson documentary In My Voice, followed by a conversation with the Heart legend herself. Thursday, The Dear Hunter will be at the Glass House.

    And, happy Cinco de Mayo! Food and drink specials and community celebrations abound on Tuesday.

    Elsewhere on LAist.com, you can catch up on Larry Mantle’s recent interview with Mayor Karen Bass, create a route to see the best street murals around L.A., and grab a ticket to see a live taping of NPR’s Wild Card with Rachel Martin and Tracee Ellis Ross at the Crawford on Thursday, May 7.

    Events

    Spaceballs

    Tuesday, May 4, 6 to 10 p.m.
    Griffith Observatory 
    2800 E. Observatory Road, Griffith Park
    COST: MEMBER ADMISSION, $45, MEMBER ADMISSION, $50 WAITLIST; MORE INFO

    I don’t even really have to say it, do I? Griffith Observatory is hosting a very special screening of the best spoof of all time ever (don’t @ me), Spaceballs. In celebration of the upcoming sequel, Spaceballs: The New One (tbd if that was necessary), star Josh Gad will be on hand and the evening includes parking, drinks and snacks, and photo ops. It’s currently waitlist-only … may the Schwartz be with you.


    Cinemasianamerica

    Through Thursday, May 7
    Laemmle Royal
    11523 Santa Monica Blvd., West L.A.
    COST: FROM $11.50; MORE INFO

    Just in time to kick off Asian American Pacific Islander Month, director Quentin Lee has put together an exciting screening series at the Laemmle Royal, featuring 30 years of Lee’s work. The Cinemasianamerica series runs through May 7 and includes screenings of Ethan Mao, The People I’ve Slept With, The Unbidden, Rez Comedy, and Last Summer of Nathan Lee. The series will wrap with Comedy InvAsian III, a sneak preview of Lee’s stand-up showcase. Most screenings include a Q&A with Lee and fellow cast members.


    Core Samples

    Through Tuesday, June 30, by appointment
    UCLA Architecture and Urban Design
    1317 Portola Plaza, Perloff Hall 1118, Westwood
    COST: FREE; MORE INFO

    L.A. has a wealth of architectural and modern building feats, many of which we have more access to than any other city, given our (relative!) youth. UCLA’s School of Architecture has some of this history on display, including posters from talks by Frank Gehry and John Julius Norwich and archival materials, including VHS tapes, faculty portraits, 35mm slides of student work, travel photographs, office drawings, and posters. It uses a classroom space to allow visitors to explore, so since the exhibit is also a working teaching archive, you do have to make an appointment.


    Netflix Is a Joke Festival

    Through Sunday, May 10
    Netflix Is a Joke Festival 
    Multiple locations 
    COST: VARIES; MORE INFO

    Comedian Pete Davidson onstage, wearing a blue short sleeve jumpsuit and holding a microphone
    WANTAGH, NY - SEPTEMBER 10: Comedian Pete Davidson performs onstage during Oddball Comedy Festival at Nikon at Jones Beach Theater on September 10, 2016 in Wantagh, New York.
    (
    Kevin Mazur/Getty Images
    /
    Getty Images North America
    )

    Where to even begin with all the incredible comedy listings for this year’s Netflix Is a Joke Festival? Whether you’re a theater person (see: Rachel Bloom guesting with Theater Adult on May 7), a fan of roasts (head to the Forum for the Roast of Kevin Hart on May 10), an SNL superfan (Pete Davidson at the Wiltern on May 9) or a podcast junkie (Girls Gotta Eat at the Palace Theatre on May 7), there’s a show for you. I didn’t even mention the 40th Anniversary of Pee-Wee’s Playhouse with the B-52s and Danny Elfman (May 4) or the Lizzo show at the Greek (May 7)! Pretty much every venue in L.A. has a comedy show this week – it might be harder not to see comedy. So find your favorite (or someone you’ve never heard of!) and get a taste of the L.A. and international comedy scene right here.


    Anissa Helou x Now Serving: For Lebanon

    Monday, May 4, 7 to 8 p.m.
    727 N. Broadway #133, Chinatown 
    COST: FROM $11.49; MORE INFO

    A poster promoting the "Annisa Helou for Lebanon" event at Now Serving on May 4, 2026.
    (
    Now Serving
    )

    L.A. Times restaurant critic Bill Addison hosts this conversation with James Beard-winning cookbook author Anissa Helou at cookbook store Now Serving in Chinatown. Helou’s latest is Lebanon: Cooking the Foods of My Homeland, celebrating the diversity of dishes from the Mediterranean country.


    TROLLS: A Field Study 

    Through Sunday, October 4
    South Coast Botanic Garden
    26300 Crenshaw Blvd., Palos Verdes Peninsula 
    COST: FREE WITH GENERAL ADMISSION ($18); MORE INFO

    A large wooden sculpture of a troll holding a notebook with a pen
    (
    South Coast Botanic Garden
    /
    South Coast Botanic Garden
    )

    Thomas Dambo’s oversized trolls are as cute as they are creepy. Twelve of those giants made entirely of reclaimed wood have made their way across the pond to guard the South Coast Botanic Garden until October. Walk through this fairytale land with admission to the gardens or plan a special guided weekend Troll Trek.

  • Bill would require evaluations
    A group of children stand on a brightly colored carpet with large dotted circles in a classroom.
    New amendments to legislation would require independent evaluations of state education programs that spend at least $500 million annually.

    Topline:

    A bill in the state legislature would require evaluations of statewide education programs, like transitional kindergarten. LAist reported in February that the state had no plans to evaluate the new grade for four-year-olds, despite billions of dollars being spent.

    What’s new: The proposed legislation would require independent evaluations of any new education initiative that costs at least $500 a million a year, or $1 billion in one-time funding. In February, reporting by LAist found the state had no formal plans to evaluate transitional kindergarten — a new grade for 4-year-olds in the public school system that was fully implemented this year.

    The backstory: The requirement is an amendment to a larger bill that would restructure the role of the state superintendent, an elected position that currently oversees the state Department of Education. In addition to LAist's reporting, the bill also follow reports from the research group Policy Analysis for California Education, as well as the Legislative Analyst’s Office, that recommend such changes.

    Why it matters: The bill’s author, state Assemblymember David Alvarez, said he was shocked to find out how much the state has spent on initiatives without a plan for evaluation. “I really see this as the opportunity to really cement what I think is a good governance practice, long-term,” he said.

    A bill moving through the state legislature would require independent evaluations of any new education initiative that costs at least $500 million a year or $1 billion in one-time spending.

    The proposed requirement is part of a larger bill that would restructure the role of the state superintendent, an elected position that currently oversees the California Department of Education.

    “That means that as we make massive investments, as have occurred in the last several years, like universal transitional kindergarten, that there is a built-in independent check to tell us what is actually working,” Assemblymember David Alvarez, the bill’s author and chair of the assembly subcommittee on education, said at a hearing a few weeks ago.

    While research shows a child’s early years are critical for learning, in February, reporting by LAist found the state had no formal plans to evaluate transitional kindergarten — a new grade for 4-year-olds in the public school system that was fully implemented this year.

     ”For TK, as you've covered well, you know, it's nonexistent,” Alvarez told LAist.

    The state has spent billions on the program, including $3.9 billion to administer it this fiscal year.

    The amendments to the bill also follow reports from the research group Policy Analysis for California Education, as well as the Legislative Analyst’s Office, that recommend reshaping the role of an elected state superintendent to include evaluation duties. But Alvarez said he thought it was crucial to take the legislation a step further and include a fiscal trigger to make evaluations mandatory, and envisions the requirement to apply to new state spending.

    How would reviews work?

    The bill as currently written only applies to new initiatives, but the superintendent would have authority to order reviews of existing programs like transitional kindergarten.

    "I'm hopeful that as we engage more with the administration on this issue, that there's an interest in evaluating a program like this one of this magnitude and others,” Alvarez said. Other existing programs include the Community Schools Partnership Program, a wrap-around services initiative, and the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program.

    The bill would allow for the independent evaluations to be done by outside research organizations.

    “I really see this as the opportunity to really cement what I think is a good governance practice, long-term,” he said. “ Resources are limited, and we don't have an infinite number of dollars to do all the work we want to do, so we’ve got to make sure that dollars are being used in the best way that serves the most number of students.”

    Have thoughts?

    Who oversees the state's education budget?

    The California State Assembly's Subcommittee on Education Finance and the State Senate's Education Committee are the points of contact for proposals and oversight of public education funding, including:

    • PreK-12 public schools
    • School facilities
    • Community colleges
    • Adult and career technical education
    • California State University
    • University of California
    • The Commission on Teacher Credentialing
    • The Student Aid Commission
    • The California State Library

    Thoughts? Questions? Concerns? Contact members of the state assembly or the state senate.

  • Union says workers are owed millions in back pay
    Three cars of a white train and black windows are visible on a gray track. There is a white arch behind the train. In the furthest background, there is a tower.
    The workers represented by the union have been testing and commissioning the LAX Automated People Mover, which is seen here going through reliability and safety testing in April 2026.

    Topline:

    A subcontractor on the LAX Automated People Mover project owes a group of workers unpaid wages and benefits, according to a grievance filed by the union representing the workers. An arbitrator in March sided with the union in its case against the subcontractor, Alstom Transport USA.

    What does this mean: The arbitrator’s decision calls on Alstom to pay the workers back wages and benefits. The International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local 18, who brought the grievance forward, said Alstom has “already shown that they don’t intend to comply with the arbitrator’s award.” In that case, the general contractor, LINXS, would be liable to remedy the pay issue, according to a copy of the arbitrator’s decision shared with LAist by the union.

    The broader context: Disputes in large-scale capital projects are not uncommon. This is one of many surrounding the Automated People Mover and not the only one to involve subcontractors. Earlier this year, LAist reported about how the main contractor, a group of companies called LINXS, is engaged in legal battles with two of its other subcontractors.

    Read on … for more details about the arbitration.

    A subcontractor on the LAX Automated People Mover project owes a group of workers unpaid wages and benefits, according to a grievance filed by the union representing the workers.

    An arbitrator held a hearing on the matter last December and formally sided with the union in his decision, which was released in March.

    The International Union of Elevator Constructors, Local 18, had argued in a grievance filed in May 2025 that subcontractor Alstom Transport USA has been paying people who have been preparing train vehicles for passenger service and testing parts at a lower rate than what’s outlined in a labor agreement governing the project.

    The union said in a statement to LAist that it is “satisfied” its claims were backed by the arbitrator and that the decision reflects the power of collective action.

    The union added that this isn’t the end of the fight since Alstom has “already shown that they don’t intend to comply with the arbitrator’s award.”

    The arbitrator noted in his decision there is some uncertainty as to how many workers would be affected since some of them were hired directly by Alstom and others through third-party firms. The union says there are 28 total workers who, regardless of how they were hired, should be compensated for their work and estimates Alstom owes them millions in wages and benefits.

    A spokesperson for Alstom said it is “reviewing the arbitrator’s recommendations.”

    “Alstom remains committed to reaching a fair and competitive wage and benefit package that recognizes the valuable contributions of our employees,” the spokesperson said.

    LINXS did not respond to a request for comment.

    Disputes in large-scale capital projects are not uncommon. This is one of many surrounding the Automated People Mover and not the only one to involve subcontractors working on the project. Earlier this year, LAist reported about how the main contractor, a group of companies called LINXS, is engaged in legal battles with two of its other subcontractors.

    Another dispute between the city and LINXS has recently intensified and could also lead to litigation.

    The project labor agreement

    At the heart of this dispute is the collective bargaining agreement that sets wages for on-site construction work, establishes dispute procedures and ensures there won’t be work stoppages over labor issues on capital projects owned by Los Angeles World Airports, the city agency that oversees LAX. The project labor agreement was first forged in 1999 and, in 2020, the airport’s board renewed it for an additional decade.

    LINXS agreed that it would be bound to the agreement and “shall require all of its subcontractors … to be similarly bound,” according to a copy of the arbitrator’s decision the union shared with LAist.

    The union has claimed that the Alstom employees were doing work that is covered by the agreement and that they should be paid accordingly.

    Alstom, according to communications cited in the arbitrator’s decision, said it never signed a document called a Letter of Assent, which formalizes a company’s obligation to follow the project labor agreement, and that, even if it did, its employees’ work isn’t covered.

    The arbitrator’s decision

    David Weinberg, the arbitrator, said the testing and commissioning work Alstom employees did is covered by the project labor agreement. Weinberg added that Alstom consented to abide by the agreement when it signed a contract to work with LINXS.

    “Not signing the Letter of Assent does not absolve Alstom of its contractual obligations to LINXS or to the Union under the [Project Labor Agreement] due to the pass-through provision,” Weinberg wrote in his decision.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

    Weinberg said that the Alstom employees should get paid the national wage and benefits rate for the International Union of Elevator Constructors for any hours of work completed starting 60 days before the union filed its grievance. Weinberg also ordered Alstom to provide the hours of work completed on-site.

    Weinberg said in his decision that if Alstom does not comply, LINXS would be on the hook, though for a smaller amount. LINXS would be liable to pay for any hours of work starting 60 days before Nov. 4, when it became a formal party to the grievance.