Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Dear LAist: Why's There That Half-Finished Target At Sunset And Western In Hollywood?

WE'RE ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS ABOUT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA THAT KEEP YOU UP AT NIGHT. IF YOU HAVE ONE, ASK IT HERE.
Target's been trying to build a new store on the corner of Sunset and Western for years, eyeing the location in 2010 and getting their plans approved in 2012. They even started and completed much of the construction -- but a legal challenge, which they lost, put construction on hold.
We've had multiple readers ask us about the half-finished structure, standing silently, waiting for an ending that refuses to come.
Target wants it, the city of Los Angeles wants it -- but there are neighborhood associations that don't. They've successfully kept it in limbo so far. It's become such a local landmark in its desolate state that it even has an unofficial Twitter account, @TargetHusk.
— Target Formerly A Husk (@TargetHusk) July 22, 2017
Hope of a Target in our time is still alive -- the city is heading back to court yet again as part of the latest appeal on Tuesday. But why is it there? What's going on?
Before construction, Target submitted two plans to the city: one that met the 35-foot height restriction in place in the neighborhood, and another larger one that didn't. The City Council granted variances allowing for the 74-foot, three-story complex, anchored by a Super Target.
The La Mirada Neighborhood Association sued to block the project, twice, and was joined by Citizens Coalition Los Angeles.
Some of the key questions behind the case:
- Whether the city violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by not preparing a supplemental environmental impact report
- Whether allowing a three-story building here is a kind of spot zoning that's against the law
The city maintains that the answer to both of those questions is "no," but they've lost that argument in court so far.
Those opposed to the construction of this Target say the city didn't follow environmental regulations -- and that it was due to then-City Councilman Eric Garcetti trying to avoid limiting density in the area.
"Target could have built the store which it wanted about a decade ago," Richard Lee Abrams with Citizens Coalition told LAist in an email. "The sole problem was Garcetti's insistence that the store be illegal."
Abrams also argued that Target won't break with Mayor Garcetti due to the politics involved.
They note that Target's original plans were expanded at Garcetti's urging. The City Council tried to rezone the area in 2016 to allow the Target to move forward -- but as we've discussed, that plan remains in litigation.
"We appreciate the city's continued support for Target in our ongoing efforts to pursue a store in Hollywood on Sunset Boulevard," a Target spokesperson told LAist in a statement, "and we thank the community for its patience as we continue to work toward resuming construction."
News happens every day. Here at LAist, our goal is to cover the stories that matter to you and the community you live in. Now that we're part of KPCC, those stories (including this one you're on right now!) are made possible by generous people like you. Independent, local journalism isn't cheap, but with your support we can keep delivering it. Donate now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.